Which example answers the board’s question?
A fictional oral board asks for one mistake you corrected.
The question
You helped run a volunteer event. You can describe the turnout or a message you sent with the wrong start time.
- Event recapThe team delivered the event and reported strong turnout.
- Your messageYou sent the wrong start time to four registrants. You sent a correction and asked each person to reply.
“Tell us about a mistake you corrected. How did you check that the correction reached people?”
Not saved by this site. Your browser may restore text when you navigate back.
A strong answer, step by step
Open each step in turn. This is one strong answer, not the only one.
Step 1: Choose the example
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Use the message you sent
The strong move. The case gives a specific mistake and a correction.
Lead with the turnout
Tempting, but it misses something. Turnout gives no evidence about the message or who received the correction.
See how a strong candidate says it
“I’d use the wrong start time. I sent that message, and I can explain how I corrected it.”
Why it works: The example answers both parts of the prompt with one event.
Step 2: Describe your action
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Name both messages and the reply check
The strong move. The board can follow how you checked the correction.
Say the event ran smoothly
Tempting, but it misses something. The event outcome leaves the receipt of the correction unresolved.
See how a strong candidate says it
“I sent the wrong start time to four people. I sent a corrected time to the same four and asked for a reply.”
Why it works: The answer identifies the action and the check.
Step 3: Check who received it
The reply log shows three confirmed receipts. One recipient has yet to reply.
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
State three confirmed and one open
The strong move. This accounts for all four recipients.
Say all four received it
Tempting, but it misses something. Sending all four messages gives no confirmation from the fourth recipient.
See how a strong candidate says it
“Three of the four confirmed receipt. One reply was still missing, so I could verify three.”
Why it works: A sent message and a confirmed receipt give different evidence.
Step 4: Give the short answer
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Give the action, result and open item
The strong move. The answer states exactly what you checked.
End with the original turnout number
Tempting, but it misses something. The turnout cannot confirm receipt of the message.
See how a strong candidate says it
“I sent four people the wrong time. I sent each a correction and asked them to reply. Three confirmed it. I’d flag the open receipt to the event lead.”
Why it works: The reply shows your action, the known result and how you shared the gap.
The answer, in short
- Decision
- Use the example that shows your correction and its reach.
- Because
- The reply log confirms three of four receipts.
- What would change it
- A fourth acknowledgment would confirm all four.
Common traps
- Separate messages sent from receipts confirmed.
Check your answer
- I chose one relevant example.
- I described my own action.
- I gave the confirmed count.
- I stated the open receipt.
Last reviewed Nov 11, 2026